Trump Lawyer Alina Habba Mocked for Constitutional Blunder on White House Lawn

Donald Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, became the subject of widespread ridicule Tuesday after making a major legal misstep while speaking on the White House lawn. Habba, in an attempt to defend Trump, claimed that “separation of powers” grants the president “ultimate authority”—a statement that directly contradicts the fundamental principles of the U.S. Constitution.

Read Also: Arizona Judge Allows Fake Electors to Challenge Charges Under Free Speech Law
Read Also: Steve Bannon Challenges Elon Musk to CPAC Debate Over Trump Agenda

Legal experts, political analysts, and social media users were quick to point out her error. The U.S. government’s system of checks and balances, designed by the Founding Fathers, was specifically created to prevent any single branch—especially the executive—from wielding unchecked power, as was the case with the English monarchy at the time.

As the United States court system explains in its official educational materials, the framers of the Constitution deliberately structured the government to ensure that no one entity holds “ultimate authority.” Habba’s remarks quickly ignited mockery across social media, with many questioning her legal knowledge.

Journalist Jake Lahut posted a blunt response: “The founders could not have envisioned Alina Habba.” Political strategist Max Flugrath of Fair Fight Action expressed his frustration with the state of political discourse, writing: “We’re in the stupidest timeline.”

Renowned legal analyst Bradley Moss responded with a simple face-palm emoji on Bluesky before adding, “I really don’t think ANY of these folks understand our system of government.” Artist Candee Corliss took a more humorous jab, quipping: “What’s the difference between a rock and Alina Habba? A rock can be useful.”

Read Also: Hakeem Jeffries Accuses GOP of ‘Bait and Switch’ on Grocery Prices
Read Also: Trump Removes Ethics Chief in Move Echoing Past Clashes Over Oversight

MSNBC columnist Michael A. Cohen—unrelated to Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen—also joined in on the criticism, noting: “Fun fact: She went to law school.” Former federal prosecutor and legal analyst Elizabeth de la Vega was even more direct, advising Habba:

“Alina, dear, go back to law school. Or, at least read Marbury v. Madison. Also, stop talking because every time you do, you make a fool of yourself.” The blunder marks yet another instance where members of Trump’s legal team have come under fire for questionable legal arguments. As Trump continues to battle multiple lawsuits and legal challenges, his attorneys’ credibility remains a focal point of public scrutiny.

For You:

• Trump Secures Release of American Teacher from Russia, Keeps Deal Terms Secret
• Wall Street Journal Warns Trump Against Repeating Trade Policy Mistakes
• Rep. Nancy Mace to Reveal Video Abuse in Emotional House Floor Speech
• VP J.D. Vance Sparks Outrage With Threat to Defy Federal Judges
• Justice Department Drops Corruption Case Against NYC Mayor Eric Adams
• Trump Admits Tariffs May Raise Prices, Says Plan Will ‘Be Less Expensive’